Re: Best Teams To Miss The Playoffs
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:27 am
1981 Broncos, 10-6, lost tiebreaker to Chargers. Lost on final Sunday, wrecked by Alan Page.
PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://www.profootballresearchers.org/forum/
https://www.profootballresearchers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7648
I totally get why you wouldn't mention teams that couldn't have gotten a wild card in their time in this discussion.Bob Gill wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2024 12:22 am I love to cite teams from the old days, but in this case I don't think teams from 1965 and earlier should be considered, because "making the playoffs" back then meant playing in the championship game, and that's not the same thing.
I do think the 1967 Colts belong on this list, and almost certainly at the top, because by then the NFL had broken into four divisions and all four division winners made the playoffs, so it's a reasonably comparable system.
I thought that also until a few years ago when I really dug in and researched the 1979 season for an Oilers documentary and book. They blew a big lead against Houston at home in Week One besides the famous Dallas fallout. Both Houston and Dallas were very good teams, but Washington also lost to the Saints and Giants, two teams they really should have defeated, and they narrowly beat the Lions.
That could be true, especially about the offense outside of Theismann and Riggins. And I do remember that Houston game -- couldn't give you any details these days, but I remember it was a tough one.GameBeforeTheMoney wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 8:15 pmI thought that also until a few years ago when I really dug in and researched the 1979 season for an Oilers documentary and book. They blew a big lead against Houston at home in Week One besides the famous Dallas fallout. Both Houston and Dallas were very good teams, but Washington also lost to the Saints and Giants, two teams they really should have defeated, and they narrowly beat the Lions.
The 79 Redskins were a good team, but for some reason they just didn't have it all together that year like they later did in the 80s. They had really good defensive players but other than Theismann and Riggins, they didn't have the offensive players we think of when we think of their Super Bowl team in 82. The 79 team seemed to be simply an above-average team in the NFL in that season.
If I remember right, they had a two-possession lead late in the game at home and lost. Had controlled the game into the fourth quarter. It's been a couple of years since I went over that game, but I want to say there was a fumble late that gave Houston the ball back. That's another thing to ponder also though, they might just have had 5-8 bad minutes in that game and maybe 2-4 bad minutes in the Dallas game that blew the entire season. Interesting how football is in that way.Bob Gill wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 10:14 pmThat could be true, especially about the offense outside of Theismann and Riggins. And I do remember that Houston game -- couldn't give you any details these days, but I remember it was a tough one.GameBeforeTheMoney wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 8:15 pmI thought that also until a few years ago when I really dug in and researched the 1979 season for an Oilers documentary and book. They blew a big lead against Houston at home in Week One besides the famous Dallas fallout. Both Houston and Dallas were very good teams, but Washington also lost to the Saints and Giants, two teams they really should have defeated, and they narrowly beat the Lions.
The 79 Redskins were a good team, but for some reason they just didn't have it all together that year like they later did in the 80s. They had really good defensive players but other than Theismann and Riggins, they didn't have the offensive players we think of when we think of their Super Bowl team in 82. The 79 team seemed to be simply an above-average team in the NFL in that season.