A Vikings/Broncos Super Bowl XXII

User avatar
Crazy Packers Fan
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:46 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: A Vikings/Broncos Super Bowl XXII

Post by Crazy Packers Fan »

Everyone seems to be on the Vikings' side here, but John Elway was the league MVP (admittedly undeserved over Jerry Rice) and the Vikings were only 8-7 in the regular season. I think the Vikes' magic had to run out at some point, and unless Anthony Carter went off like he did against San Francisco, the Broncos should have pulled it out in San Diego.
User avatar
74_75_78_79_
Posts: 2561
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm

Re: A Vikings/Broncos Super Bowl XXII

Post by 74_75_78_79_ »

Crazy Packers Fan wrote: Sun Apr 27, 2025 1:50 pm Everyone seems to be on the Vikings' side here, but John Elway was the league MVP (admittedly undeserved over Jerry Rice) and the Vikings were only 8-7 in the regular season. I think the Vikes' magic had to run out at some point, and unless Anthony Carter went off like he did against San Francisco, the Broncos should have pulled it out in San Diego.
Again, MInny wasn't 8-7 but really 8-4. Yes, not juggernaut, but pretty good. And, again, they had a better non-scab record going into their finale than their opponent, Washington. They were 8-3 with Wash at 7-4.

Just the same, yes, maybe I shouldn't give the Vikings too much credit in this hypothetical. I still think they win, and not by a nail-biter. I still think Minny has a better chance to win this one than either against Denver in '98 or Colts in '09. But maybe I should give '87 Denver a bit more credit here. Yes, they would definitely have the advantage at QB. Vikings weren't a juggernaut and if Denver was favorite over Washington, they sure as heck would have been the favorite here as well.

Question I have, if Broncos do win in this hypo-SBXXII match, does their title get looked back upon as being...'tainted'?? A championship is a championship but, man...those powerhouses that were knocked out of the NFC for them! I'm guessing that only the '11 Giants would be seen as a lesser SB-champ.

It wouldn't have just been San Fran & Wash who Denver would have,,,"avoided". Despite they beating Chicago in their home MNF game against them, even the Bears - I think - would have beaten them in a hypo-SBXXII rematch had they actually, somehow got there. A bit paper-tiger-looking, especially with that late MNF blowout at Candlestick followed by the home convincer to Seattle, but I think they pull it off. Again, if they actually...get there. Especially if a healthy McMahon plays. Bears already having the experience of winning-it-all, just two years removed, Dan Reeves obvious not being at his best in SBs, and of course the "win it for Sweetness" factor with this being his final game...

I haven't mentioned the Saints yet. It's tough for me to invite them into this hypothetical with that 44-10 egg they laid in that Wild Card game. A great 10-2 non-scab regular season they had in that inaugural playoff year of theirs. Despite '87 being another strike year, I was excited over their surge, going into the playoffs on such high momentum. Nice enough stats though they really weren't quite dynamic, and posted some quality non-scab wins as well! I really wanted them to beat Minny! They force an early turnover deep in Vikings territory which they immediately turned into a TD to go up 7-0; but that's as good as it got. And then that cruel backbreaking TD bomb just before the half!

It, sadly, was a harbinger of their obvious post-season struggles to come as well as, perhaps, also being a sign that it would take them another three years just to get to that second (8-8) playoff berth! They should have beaten MInny going by what they did compared to them during the regular season. But if Saints do advance, I'm not sure they beat San Fran despite splitting with them or beat Joe Gibbs either. Honestly, I'm not even sure they would have beaten Chicago had they played them (both played in the final scab week). But if they, somehow, do make it to SBXXII, I don't see a reason for me to think Denver actually beats them, but who knows?
CSKreager
Posts: 740
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:13 pm

Re: A Vikings/Broncos Super Bowl XXII

Post by CSKreager »

74_75_78_79_ wrote: Sun Apr 27, 2025 4:25 pm I haven't mentioned the Saints yet. It's tough for me to invite them into this hypothetical with that 44-10 egg they laid in that Wild Card game. A great 10-2 non-scab regular season they had in that inaugural playoff year of theirs. Despite '87 being another strike year, I was excited over their surge, going into the playoffs on such high momentum. Nice enough stats though they really weren't quite dynamic, and posted some quality non-scab wins as well! I really wanted them to beat Minny! They force an early turnover deep in Vikings territory which they immediately turned into a TD to go up 7-0; but that's as good as it got. And then that cruel backbreaking TD bomb just before the half!
In regards to the Saints, the real hypothetical with them is what if Minnesota MISSED the playoffs (ie Dallas doesn't knock out the Cardinals)?

I highly doubt St. Louis beats them 44-10
Post Reply