Re: Injuries that changed the course of a franchise
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2021 8:33 pm
Agree on Jones. Colts window was closing. Their drafts got worse after Joe Thomas was forced out as GM.
PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://www.profootballresearchers.org/forum/
https://www.profootballresearchers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5787
I respectfully disagree. That 1991 Redskins team was one of the best of all time. 260 point differential and a very tuff schedule.JKelly wrote: With the defense the Eagles had that year, they win the division and make the SB if Cunningham is healthy. They don't lose to the Cowboys, Cardinals, Saint or Buccaneers. They don't lose 23-0 to Redskins and maybe even sweep them. Only game I don't know if they win is against the 49ers.
Ralph, you also feel that Bulger was better than Warner. Geeen and Bulger will never make the HOVG, never mind the HOF, so what is it about Warner that makes you feel he is so overrated?rhickok1109 wrote:I still think Green was better than Warner.Teo wrote:1999 Rams: Trent Green got injured in the preseason and Dick Vermeil says that they will play “good Football” with Kurt Warner. Surely they did!
That's the first one I thought of, Randall Cunningham's injury.....7DnBrnc53 wrote:Randall Cunningham's injury in 1991. Before he got hurt, there were people out there who believed that the Eagles were a SB contender.
If they make a run in 1991 with a healthy Randall (I think they get to the NFC Title Game and lose at Washington), there could have been more motivation to go all the way in 1992. And, if that somehow butterflies away Jerome Brown's death (it probably doesn't, but who knows), the Eagles may do it, and Reggie doesn't decide to leave for GB in 1993.
Also, Randall probably doesn't retire for a year and end up in Minnesota, and Rich Kotite stays longer.
Another thing to remember was that the Redskins always seemed to have Randall’s number. Eliminate that crazy 1989 game at RFK where Randall passed for over 400 yards, Randall would often get flustered against the Redskins. Richie Petibone knew how to take away Randall’s running lanes, which essentially shut down the Eagle offense. There is no reason to believe had Randall been healthy in 1991 that he suddenly would have overcome his difficulties against Washington.Sonny9 wrote:I respectfully disagree. That 1991 Redskins team was one of the best of all time. 260 point differential and a very tuff schedule.JKelly wrote: With the defense the Eagles had that year, they win the division and make the SB if Cunningham is healthy. They don't lose to the Cowboys, Cardinals, Saint or Buccaneers. They don't lose 23-0 to Redskins and maybe even sweep them. Only game I don't know if they win is against the 49ers.
14-2 with 8 games against playoff teams in the regular season. They went 6-2 against then and 1 loss was a meaningless loss the last game of the season and it took a 4th Quarter comeback to do it. Philly didn't have a RB and their offense was 1 dimensional.
The 1990 Eagles were the same team as the 1990 10-6 team. They split in 1990 and Phillys win came against the backup QBs.